In a move that has sparked international debate, the United States officially announced its withdrawal from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), citing what it called "anti-Israel bias" and the promotion of "divisive issues" within the agency.
According to a statement by the U.S. State Department, the decision reflects that continued participation in UNESCO is "no longer aligned with the national interest of the United States."
U.S. Withdrawal: National Interest Comes First
The State Department’s spokesperson stated that the decision followed a thorough internal review, during which the U.S. found the organization's actions increasingly disconnected from its core values, particularly regarding Israel.
The review highlighted concerns over policies related to diversity, equity, and inclusion, as well as what the U.S. described as a growing bias in favor of Palestinians and China.
Israel Welcomes the Move: "A Step Toward Justice"
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar praised the U.S. move, calling it a "necessary step designed to promote justice and uphold Israel’s right to fair treatment within the UN system."
In his words:
UNESCO Reacts: “Regrettable, but Expected”
UNESCO’s Director-General Audrey Azoulay responded by describing the U.S. decision as “regrettable, though not surprising.” Her statement reflects ongoing tensions between the organization and Washington, particularly during recent years of strained relations under multiple U.S. administrations.
The Trump Connection: Roots of the Exit
The origins of this decision trace back to former President Donald Trump. In February, he ordered a 90-day review of U.S. involvement in UNESCO, focusing on what he believed to be anti-Semitic and anti-Israel sentiments within the organization.
According to a report by the New York Post, senior officials in the Trump administration were also critical of the agency’s positions on diversity and inclusion, arguing that they masked political bias—especially in favor of Palestinians and China.
Flashback: Jerusalem, Palestine, and Cultural Heritage
UNESCO and the U.S. have had a rocky relationship for years. One major point of contention has been the organization's recognition of Palestinian heritage sites and its labeling of East Jerusalem as part of occupied Palestinian territory.
These decisions have long been a source of frustration for both the U.S. and Israel, who argue that the organization has overstepped its bounds and engaged in politically charged resolutions.
Read also:
Trump Threatens to Revoke Rosie O’Donnell’s U.S. Citizenship
Trump threatens to impose 10% tariffs on BRICS
What the U.S. Withdrawal Means for UNESCO:
Funding Loss: The U.S. has historically been one of UNESCO’s biggest donors.
Reduced American Influence: The U.S. exit leaves space for other global powers like China or Russia to expand their soft power.
Impact on UNESCO’s Programs: From education to heritage preservation, many projects may face funding and political challenges.
Final Thoughts: A Political Shift or a Strategic Exit?
While some see the U.S. withdrawal as a principled stance against bias, others argue it undermines global cooperation in fields like education, science, and culture. The move raises questions about America's future role in international institutions and the influence of geopolitics in shaping global policy.
As Israel applauds and UNESCO laments, the world watches closely:
Will this be a temporary break or a lasting rift?
What do you think? Does the U.S. withdrawal hurt global cultural cooperation, or is it a justified political stance? Share your thoughts below.